Perceptions about doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (Doxy-PEP) as an STI-prevention strategy among gay and bisexual men (GBM) in the United States: Results from a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To leverage qualitative data to explore gay and bisexual men's (GBM) perceptions about doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (Doxy-PEP). Doxy-PEP is a novel biomedical STI-prevention strategy that helps reduce the risk of acquiring bacterial STIs. Little is known about Doxy-PEP's acceptability in the U.S., nor how best to engage those most vulnerable to STIs in taking up this nascent prevention strategy. METHOD: Between July and September of 2023, 24 GBM from across the U.S. completed qualitative interviews about their perceptions regarding Doxy-PEP. Interviews were analyzed using a codebook approach to thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants were generally interested in using Doxy-PEP, but were concerned about the potential for antibiotic resistance, side-effects, medication interactions to occur, along with stigmatizing discourse around its use. Meanwhile, participants were motivated by the simplicity of Doxy-PEP and the protection it could confer on both an individual and community-level- as well as its potential to reduce STI-related anxiety. Finally, participants desired additional information on Doxy-PEP to address their concerns. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for clear guidelines and expanded public health messaging on Doxy-PEP in the U.S.

The first confirmed human case of rabies, Timor-Leste, 2024.

In March 2024, the first ever human case of rabies, following a dog bite, was detected in Timor-Leste. This paper briefly discusses the circumstances of transmission, clinical presentation, palliative care of the case and public health measures taken. Timor-Leste was previously considered rabies-free. Any person who is bitten or scratched by an animal that could potentially transmit rabies virus (especially dogs, bats, monkeys or cats) in Timor-Leste should be assessed for consideration of provision of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis.

Comparative Effectiveness of Baloxavir Marboxil and Oseltamivir Treatment in Reducing Household Transmission of Influenza: A Post Hoc Analysis of the BLOCKSTONE Trial.

BACKGROUND: The transmission of influenza virus in households, especially by children, is a major route of infection. Prior studies suggest that timely antiviral treatment of ill cases may reduce infection in household contacts. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of oseltamivir (OTV) and baloxavir marboxil (BXM) treatment of index cases on the secondary attack rate (SAR) of influenza within household. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was done in BLOCKSTONE trial-a placebo-controlled, double-blinded post-exposure prophylaxis of BXM. Data were derived from the laboratory-confirmed index cases' household contacts who received placebo in the trial and also from household members who did not participate in the trial but completed illness questionnaires. To assess the SAR of household members, multivariate analyses adjusted for factors including age, vaccination status, and household size were performed and compared between contacts of index cases treated with BXM or OTV. RESULTS: In total, 185 index cases (116 treated with BXM and 69 treated with OTV) and 410 household contacts (201 from trial, 209 by questionnaire) were included. The Poisson regression modeling showed that the SAR in household contacts of index cases treated with BXM and OTV was 10.8% and 18.5%, respectively; the adjusted relative reduction in SAR was 41.8% (95% confidence interval: 1.0%-65.7%, p = 0.0456) greater with BXM than OTV. Similar reductions were found in contacts from the trial and those included by questionnaire. CONCLUSION: BXM treatment of index cases appeared to result in a greater reduction in secondary household transmission than OTV treatment.

The impact of socio-environmental factors on doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis awareness in the US: a cross-sectional study.

Background We investigated awareness and use of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) in the US. DoxyPEP has preventative benefits for bacterial STIs among people assigned male at birth. We considered how individual, interpersonal and social determinants of health, such as state-level LGBTQ equality, impact doxyPEP awareness. Methods We conducted an online snapshot cross-sectional survey in June 2023. Survey questions included demographics, sexual and substance use behaviours, and socio-environmental factors, and provided a short explanation of doxyPEP, with questions regarding prior awareness and use. Results Among a racially diverse sample of 196 participants (median age 33 years), 94% identified as cisgender men, 26% were aware of doxyPEP, whereas only 14 (7%) had ever used it. Factors significantly associated with awareness included being college educated (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.09-5.74), a past year bacterial STI (OR 4.20, 95% CI 1.97-8.89), having discussed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis with a health care provider (OR 3.88, 95% CI 1.99-7.57) and having taken HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.11-4.70). Socio-environmental factors associated with doxyPEP awareness included living in a large urban city (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.12-4.10) and living in a state with higher levels of LGBTQ policy equality (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.07-4.44). Conclusions Considering the disproportionate impact of bacterial STIs on men who have sex with men, especially those living in lower LGBTQ equality regions, such as the Southern US, our study emphasises how socio-environmental factors may limit awareness and uptake of novel biomedical approaches that have the potential to prevent morbidity and enhance sexual health.

Doxycycline as Postsexual Exposure Prophylaxis: Use, Acceptability, and Associated Sexual Health Behaviors Among a Multi-Site Sample of Clinical Trial Participants.

Doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) reduces sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). In a clinical trial of doxy-PEP, we sought to assess acceptability, impact, and meaning of doxy-PEP use among MSM/TGW. We conducted semistructured, in-depth 1:1 interviews with MSM and TGW enrolled in the intervention arm of the Doxy-PEP study. We queried motivations for and meaning of use, attitudes, beliefs, adherence, effect on sexual behaviors, and partner, community, and structural factors related to use. We coded interview transcripts into content areas, followed by thematic analysis. We interviewed 44 participants (median age 38), 2% were TGW, 17% Black, 61% White, 30% Hispanic, and 45% persons with HIV. We identified three overarching themes. First, participants found doxy-PEP acceptable, and believed it was effective based on their history of STIs, easy to adhere to, and acceptable to sex partners. Second, doxy-PEP benefited their quality of life and mental health, offering "peace of mind" by reducing their anxiety about acquisition or unwitting transmission of STIs. Participants reported feeling more "in control" of preventing STIs, and positive about supporting their personal, partner, and community health. Third, impact on sexual behavior was variable, with most reporting no change or a brief initial change. Participants in a multi-site clinical trial of doxycycline for STI prevention perceived it to be efficacious, and that it provided quality-of-life benefits, including reduced anxiety and sense of control over sexual health. Doxy-PEP had limited impact on sexual behavior. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03980223.

Comparative Study on the Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Different Post-exposure Intramuscular Rabies Vaccination Regimens in China.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the current Essen rabies post-exposure immunization schedule (0-3-7-14-28) in China and the simple 4-dose schedule (0-3-7-14) newly recommended by the World Health Organization in terms of their safety, efficacy, and protection. Methods: Mice were vaccinated according to different immunization schedules, and blood was collected for detection of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNAs) on days 14, 21, 28, 35, and 120 after the first immunization. Additionally, different groups of mice were injected with lethal doses of the CVS-11 virus on day 0, subjected to different rabies immunization schedules, and assessed for morbidity and death status. In a clinical trial, 185 rabies-exposed individuals were selected for post-exposure vaccination according to the Essen schedule, and blood was collected for RVNAs detection on days 28 and 42 after the first immunization. Results: A statistically significant difference in RVNAs between mice in the Essen and 0-3-7-14 schedule groups was observed on the 35th day ( P < 0.05). The groups 0-3-7-14, 0-3-7-21, and 0-3-7-28 showed no statistically significant difference ( P > 0.05) in RVNAs levels at any time point. The post-exposure immune protective test showed that the survival rate of mice in the control group was 20%, whereas that in the immunization groups was 40%. In the clinical trial, the RVNAs positive conversion rates on days 28 (14 days after 4 doses) and 42 (14 days after 5 doses) were both 100%, and no significant difference in RVNAs levels was observed ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: The simple 4-dose schedule can produce sufficient RVNAs levels, with no significant effect of a delayed fourth vaccine dose (14-28 d) on the immunization potential.

[Perception of risk of HIV infection and knowledge about the use of antiretrovirals in prevention]. / Percepción de riesgo de infección por HIV y conocimiento sobre uso de antirretrovirales en prevención.

INTRODUCTION: Combined prevention (CP) is considered the key strategy against the HIV epidemic. The objective of the study was to evaluate the perception of risk of HIV infection and the knowledge about the use of antiretrovirals (ARV) for prevention, among patients who attend a Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) clinic. METHODS: A survey on personal data and perception of risk of HIV infection, knowledge about post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), was administered to patients at the time of applying doses of penicillin for the treatment of syphilis, or when taking a blood sample for STI diagnosis, between May and December, 2022. RESULTS: 100 persons were surveyed: 43 were under 25 years of age, 67 reported male sex-gender and 33 females. Thirty of 91 (33%) perceived they had had some risk of infection in their lives, 19 of them in the last year; 77/96 (80%) stated that they had no knowledge about PEP, and 82/100, about PrEP. Only 22 out of 100 responded that antiretrovirals could provide benefit in preventing HIV; 26 (60%) of the 43 patients <25 years of age, and 18 of the 57 ≥ 25 years (31.6%) responded they have had two or more sexual partners in the last year. No statistically significant differences were observed related to gender and age group. DISCUSSION: The low perception of infection risk and knowledge about the use of antiretrovirals in HIV prevention, show the existing difficulties for the implementation of combined prevention (PEP-PrEP) in this population.

Introducción: La prevención combinada (PC) se considera la estrategia clave frente a la epidemia de HIV. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la percepción de riesgo de infección por HIV y el conocimiento sobre uso de antirretrovirales (ARV) para prevención, entre pacientes que concurren a un consultorio de Infecciones de Transmisión Sexual (ITS). Métodos: Una encuesta sobre datos personales y percepción de riesgo de infección por HIV, conocimiento sobre profilaxis posterior a la exposición (PEP) y previa a la exposición (PrEP), fue administrada a pacientes al momento de aplicar dosis de penicilina para tratamiento de sífilis, o de extraer muestra de sangre para diagnóstico de ITS, entre mayo y diciembre, 2022. Resultados: De 100 personas encuestadas, 43 eran menores de 25 años, 67 reportaron sexo-género masculino y 33 femenino. Treinta de 91, (33%), percibían haber tenido en su vida algún riesgo de infección, 19 de ellas en el último año; 77/96 (80%) manifestaron no tener conocimiento sobre PEP, y 82/100, sobre PrEP. Solo 22% respondió que los antirretrovirales podrían brindar beneficio para prevenir el HIV; 26 (60%) de los 43 menores de 25 años, y 18 de los 57 ≥ 25 años (31.6%) respondieron haber tenido dos o más parejas sexuales el último año. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas, relacionadas con género y grupo etario. Discusión: La baja percepción de riesgo de infección y del conocimiento sobre uso de antirretrovirales para prevención de HIV, evidencian las dificultades existentes en la implementación de prevención combinada (PEPPrEP) en esta población.

45 years of tetracycline post exposure prophylaxis for STIs and the risk of tetracycline resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is considerable interest in the use of doxycycline post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to reduce the incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). An important concern is that this could select for tetracycline resistance in these STIs and other species. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar, (1948-2023) for randomized controlled trials comparing tetracycline PEP with non-tetracycline controls. The primary outcome was antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to tetracyclines in all bacterial species with available data. Our search yielded 140 studies, of which three met the inclusion criteria. Tetracycline PEP was associated with an increasedprevalence of tetracycline resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, but this effect was not statistically significant (Pooled OR 2.3, 95% CI 0.9-3.4). PEP had a marked effect on the N. gonorrhoeae tetracycline MIC distribution in the one study where this was assessed. Prophylactic efficacy was 100% at low MICs and 0% at high MICs. In the one study where this was assessed, PEP resulted in a significant increase in tetracycline resistance in commensal Neisseria species compared to the control group (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.5) but no significant effect on the prevalence of tetracycline resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The available evidence suggests that PEP with tetracyclines could be associated with selecting tetracycline resistance in N. gonorrhoeae and commensal Neisseria species.

Utilization of post-exposure prophylaxis potentially contributed to the changes of risk behaviors among men who have sex with men in China.

Background: The HIV infection status among men who have sex with men (MSM) in China is a cause for concern. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) serves as a highly effective biomedical preventive measure against HIV infection. Substantial evidence has established an association between PEP utilization and risk behaviors among MSM, but whether the utilization of PEP has an impact on risk behaviors remains unknown. This study sought to elucidate the impact of PEP usage on risk behaviors among MSM and provide recommendations for developing targeted HIV prevention programs. Methods: A cohort study was conducted in Qingdao, China, from April 2021 to January 2022. Participants were enlisted by volunteers from community-based organizations through a snowball sampling method. Face-to-face interviews were conducted to collect sociodemographic and behavioral information of participants. The study encompassed a retrospective investigation, baseline survey, and follow-up survey, representing periods before, during, and after PEP usage, respectively. Generalized estimating equations, fitting a Poisson regression model, were applied to scrutinize changes in risk behaviors of MSM during and after PEP usage, in comparison to before PEP usage. Results: A total of 341 MSM were recruited in the cohort study, with 179 individuals completing the follow-up survey. In comparison to before PEP usage, there was a significant increase in the proportion of Rush Popper usage (17.6% vs. 23.8% vs. 29.6%) and commercial sexual partners (10.9% vs. 17.6% vs. 21.8%) among MSM during and after PEP usage. Before PEP usage, 88.7% of MSM reported having ≥3 temporary sexual partners in the last 6 months. This proportion exhibited no significant change during PEP usage (91.8%), but it significantly increased to 97.8% after PEP usage (P < 0.05). Notably, there was a significant decrease in group sex during and after PEP usage compared to before PEP usage (30.8% vs. 21.4% vs. 21.2%). Conclusion: The utilization of PEP may impact risk behaviors among MSM, potentially leading to increased Rush Popper usage, temporary sexual partners, and commercial sexual partners after PEP usage, accompanied by a decrease in group sex. Further research is imperative to elucidate the impact of PEP utilization on MSM and develop targeted HIV prevention programs.

Mitoquinone mesylate as post-exposure prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: an exploratory single center pragmatic open label non-randomized pilot clinical trial with matched controls.

BACKGROUND: An ongoing important need exists to rapidly develop novel therapeutics for COVID-19 that will retain antiviral efficacy in the setting of rapidly evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants and potential future development of resistance of SARS-COV-2 to remdesivir and protease inhibitors. To date, there is no FDA-approved treatment for post-exposure prophylaxis against SAR-CoV-2. We have shown that the mitochondrial antioxidant mitoquinone/mitoquinol mesylate (Mito-MES), a dietary supplement, has antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and in SARS-CoV-2 infected K18-hACE2 mice. METHODS: In this exploratory, pragmatic open label clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05381454), we studied whether Mito-MES is an effective post-exposure prophylaxis treatment in people who had high-grade unmasked exposures to SARS-CoV-2 within 5 days prior to study entry. Participants were enrolled in real-world setting in Los Angeles, United States between May 1 and December 1, 2022 and were assigned to either mito-MES 20 mg daily for 14 days (n = 40) or no mito-MES (controls) (n = 40). The primary endpoint was development of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on 4 COVID-19 diagnostic tests [rapid antigen tests (RATs) or PCR] performed during the study period (14 days post exposure). FINDINGS: Out of 40 (23 females; 57.5%) study participants who took Mito-MES, 12 (30%) developed SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to 30 of the 40 controls (75%) (difference -45.0%, 95% confidence intervals (CI): -64.5%, -25.5%). Out of 40 (19 females; 47.5%) study participants in the control group, 30 (75.0%) had at least one positive COVID-19 diagnostic test and 23 (57.5%) were symptomatic. With regards to key secondary outcomes, among symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, the median duration of viral symptoms was lower in the Mito-MES group (median 3.0, 95% CI 2.75, 3.25) compared to the control group (median 5.0, 95% CI 4.0, 7.0). None of the study participants was hospitalized or required oxygen therapy. Mito-MES was well tolerated and no serious side effect was reported in any study participant. INTERPRETATION: This work describes antiviral activity of mito-MES in humans. Mito-MES was well tolerated in our study population and attenuated transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given established safety of Mito-MES in humans, our results suggest that randomized control clinical trials of Mito-MES as post-exposure prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection are warranted. FUNDING: This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant R01AG059501 (TK), National Institutes of Health grant R01AG059502 04S1 (TK), NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) UCLA CTSI Grant Number UL1TR001881 and California HIV/AIDS Research Program grant OS17-LA-002 (TK).

A cross-sectional investigation of the factors associated with awareness of PEP and PrEP among Queensland university students.

OBJECTIVE: University creates unique social environments for many young people that can result in behaviour changes that can impact sexual health-related risks and facilitate transmission of HIV. Little is known about HIV knowledge, risk, and awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis/post-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP/PEP) among Australian university students. METHODS: A 2019 online survey distributed through Queensland universities, using active recruitment/snowball sampling. Descriptive and logistical regression analysis investigated HIV knowledge/risk and PrEP/PEP awareness. RESULTS: Of the 4,291 responses, 60.4% were 20-29 years old, 57.0% identified as heterosexual, and 31.8% were born-overseas. Mean HIV knowledge score was 9.8/12. HIV risk scores were higher among men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) (mean=5.2/40) compared to all other sexual behaviours (mean=3.1/40). Logistic regression indicated PrEP and PEP awareness was associated with older age (p<0.05), being non-binary/gender-diverse (p<0.05), and MSM (p<0.05). Lower odds of PrEP awareness were associated with international student status (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the need for future health promotion targeting younger Australians at risk of HIV to increase uptake of PrEP/PEP, particularly among overseas-born young people and those ineligible for appropriate health care in Australia. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Addressing these gaps will improve sexual health outcomes for young Australians at risk of HIV and work towards virtual elimination of HIV transmission in Australia.

Australian consensus statement on doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) for the prevention of syphilis, chlamydia and gonorrhoea among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men.

INTRODUCTION: Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) involves consuming 200 mg of doxycycline up to 72 hours after a condomless sex act to reduce the risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Recent clinical trials of doxy-PEP have demonstrated significant reductions in syphilis, chlamydia and, to a lesser degree, gonorrhoea among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). There is a high level of interest in doxy-PEP in the GBMSM community and, in response, the Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine (ASHM) held a national consensus conference with the aim of creating preliminary guidance for clinicians, community, researchers and policy makers. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: There was broad agreement that doxy-PEP should be considered primarily for the prevention of syphilis in GBMSM who are at risk of this STI, with a secondary benefit of reductions in other bacterial STIs. At the end of the consensus process, there remained some disagreement, as some stakeholders felt strongly that doxy-PEP should be considered only for the prevention of syphilis in GBMSM, and that the risk of increasing antimicrobial resistance outweighed any potential benefit from reductions in other bacterial STIs in the target population. The national roundtable made several other recommendations for clinicians, community, researchers and policy makers, as detailed in this article. ASHM will support the development of detailed clinical guidelines and education materials on doxy-PEP (www.ashm.org.au/doxy-pep). CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THIS CONSENSUS STATEMENT: For GBMSM at high risk of syphilis, and perhaps other bacterial STIs, clinicians may consider prescribing doxy-PEP for a limited period of time, followed by a review of ongoing need. Unlike human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), doxy-PEP may not be suitable as a population-level intervention and should instead be used more selectively.

Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in the emergency department.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Rabies is a zoonotic single-stranded RNA lyssavirus that can cause acute infections of the central nervous system (CNS) including encephalomyelitis, encephalitis, and meningoencephalitis that is progressively fatal. Rabies is more common in developing countries, but approximately 23,000 people in the United States (US) are estimated to have been exposed or to have received post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) yearly. Nebraska Medicine follows the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guidelines for the vaccination series, as well as the 20 units/kg administration of immunoglobulin (RIG). Nebraska Medicine Medical Center (NMC) and Bellevue Medical Center (BMC) treat the scheduling of the complete rabies vaccine series differently. At both campuses, patients receive their immunoglobulin and first vaccine in the Emergency Department (ED). At NMC, patients are scheduled to receive the remainder of their vaccination series at the outpatient infusion center by the ED pharmacist. At BMC, the subsequent vaccinations are given as "Nurse Only" return visits to the ED. The objective of this study was to compare patient compliance of two different processes for follow-up rabies vaccine series completion. This project's primary aim was to determine the rate of patient compliance for follow up rabies vaccine doses. The secondary aims of this project were to determine if there was a difference in patient follow-up compliance between the two campuses, patient specific factors that impact compliance, and potential cost savings if a dose rounding protocol for RIG was utilized. METHODS: This retrospective chart review was completed as a quality improvement project. Data from patients who had received either rabies immunoglobulin and/or a rabies vaccine, were >18 years of age, and were not admitted were collected for a 3-year period from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. Data were abstracted from the patient's EMR (electronic medical records) using a SQL (Structured query language) query of pre-identified data elements. When unable to abstract with SQL query, data elements were manually abstracted. All data abstracted was collated and descriptive analysis performed. RESULTS: A total of 723 individual encounters were identified during the study period. After combining rabies series for each individual patient, 173 unique patients remained. After exclusions were applied, 143 patients were included: 104 patients from NMC, and 39 from BMC. For the primary outcome, appropriate completion between the two campuses was 78.3%. When comparing the two campuses, completion rates were higher at NMC (82% vs. 69%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.12). Appropriate completion of vaccine series was statistically significant for both payor and exposure type. Application of a dose rounding policy with those >45 kg, rounding to the nearest vial, as well as rounding down if at the midpoint interval, 56 fewer vials would have been used between the two campuses. This would have resulted in a potential cost savings of $57,928.64 over the study period.

Real-world evidence of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Serbia: Nation-wide observational study (2017-2019).

BACKGROUND: Rabies remains a deadly zoonotic disease, primarily prevalent in Eastern European countries, with a significant global burden in Asia and Africa. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is critical to prevent clinical rabies. Serbia, a country with a relatively low animal rabies incidence, has been implementing a 4-dose Essen PEP regimen for 13 years. This real-world study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the 4-dose Essen regimen, considering demographic and clinical factors, after WHO Category III exposure. METHOD: The study included 601 patients who received the 4-dose Essen PEP and 79 who received an additional 5th dose. RESULTS: Age emerged as a critical factor influencing seroconversion rates after the 4-dose regimen, with older individuals exhibiting lower RVNA titers. Logistic regression indicated a 3.18% decrease in seroconversion odds for each added year of age. The Cox proportional hazards mixed model highlighted age-related risks, with age groups 45-60 and 75-92 at the highest risk of non-seroconversion. Human Rabies Immune Globulin (HRIG) administration was associated with lower RVNA values after the 4-dose regimen, suggesting interference with vaccine immunogenicity among people who received larger doses of HRIG. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable real-world evidence for rabies PEP in a non-homogeneous population with potential comorbidities. The results underscore the importance of optimizing PEP strategies, particularly in older individuals, and reconsidering HRIG dosing to improve seroconversion rates.

Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis could theoretically select for resistance to various antimicrobials in 19 pathobionts: an in silico analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Doxycycline post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has been shown to reduce the incidence of bacterial STIs. However, if there is genetic linkage between resistance to tetracycline and other antimicrobials, then it could also select for resistance to these other antimicrobials. We therefore undertook to evaluate if there is an association between the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of tetracycline and other antimicrobials in 19 clinically important bacterial species. METHODS: Mixed-effects linear regression was used to assess if minocycline MICs were associated with the MICs of eight other antimicrobials (ceftriaxone, ampicillin, oxacillin, vancomycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, amikacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) in 19 bacterial species in the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) database. RESULTS: With the notable exception of vancomycin, where no association was found, strong positive associations were typically found between the MICs of minocycline and each of the eight antimicrobials in each of the species assessed. For example, the minocycline MICs of all the Gram-positive species were positively associated with ampicillin, ceftriaxone, oxacillin and erythromycin MICs (all P-values < 0.001). The only exceptions were ampicillin for Streptococcus pyogenes and ceftriaxone for S. dysgalactiae, where no significant associations were found. Similarly in the Gram-negative species, the minocycline MICs of all the species except Haemophilus influenzae and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were positively associated with the MICs of ceftriaxone, ampicillin, levofloxacin and amikacin (all P-values < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a theoretical risk that doxycycline PEP could select for resistance not only to tetracyclines but to a range of other antimicrobials in each of the 19 pathobionts assessed.

Longitudinal predictors of post-exposure prophylaxis awareness among latino sexual minority men in South Florida.

Biomedical tools for HIV prevention such as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) continue to be underutilized by subgroups experiencing significant HIV inequities. Specifically, factors associated with both PEP awareness and uptake both cross-sectionally and longitudinally are under-researched, despite PEP being a part of the United States' Plan for Ending the HIV Epidemic. The current study examined longitudinal predictors of PEP awareness among Latino sexual minority men (LSMM) living in South Florida. This current study (N = 290) employed hierarchal linear modeling across three timepoints (baseline, 4-months, 8-months) to assess within-person and between-person effects over time for several psychosocial and structural factors. Most participants (67.5%) reported little to no awareness of PEP at baseline with general PEP awareness growing slightly across the study (60.5% reporting little to no awareness of PEP at 8 months). Results of the final conditional model suggest significant within-person effects of PrEP knowledge (p = 0.02) and PrEP self-efficacy (p < 0.001), as well as a significant positive between-person effect of PrEP knowledge (p < 0.01) on PEP awareness. Between-person HIV knowledge was also a significant predictor in this model (p = 0.01). This longitudinal analysis of LSMM's PEP awareness indicates that more must be done to increase PEP awareness among this subgroup. Future studies should explore how to build on existing interventions focused on HIV and PrEP knowledge and PrEP self-efficacy to incorporate information about PEP to increase the reach of this effective biomedical HIV prevention tool.

Feasibility of post-exposure-prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin and identification of high prevalent clusters in villages' hyperendemic for leprosy in Senegal.

INTRODUCTION: Senegal is a leprosy low-endemic country with nine villages known to be hyperendemic with a leprosy incidence rate above 1,000 per million inhabitants. We aim to implement a door-to-door screening strategy associated with the administration of a single-dose-rifampicin (SDR) as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to household and social contacts in these villages and to identify spatial clustering and assess the risk of leprosy in population according to the physical distance to the nearest index-case. METHODS: From October/2020 to February/2022 active door-to-door screening for leprosy was conducted in nine villages. Using an open-source application, we recorded screening results, demographic and geographic coordinate's data. Using Poisson model we analysed clustering and estimated risk of contracting leprosy in contacts according to the distance to the nearest new leprosy patient. RESULTS: In nine villages, among 9086 contacts listed, we examined 7115. Among 6554 eligible contacts, 97.8% took SDR. We found 39(0.64%) new leprosy cases among 6,124 examined in six villages. Among new cases, 21(53.8%) were children, 10(25.6%) were multibacillary and 05(12.8%) had grade 2 disability. The prevalent risk ratio and 95% confidence intervale(95%CI) adjusted by village were 4.2(95%CI 1.7-10.1), 0.97(95%CI 0.2-4.4), 0.87(95%CI 0.2-25), 0.89(95%CI 0.3-2.6) and 0.70(95%CI 0.2-2.5) for the contacts living in the same household of an index case, 1-25m, 26-50m, 51-75m and 76-100m compared to those living at more than 100m respectively. We identified nine high prevalent clusters including 27/39(69%) of new cases in 490/7,850(6%) inhabitants, with relative risks of 46.6(p-value = 0.01), and 7.3, 42.8, 8.2, 12.5, 11.4, 23.5, 22.3, and 14.6 (non-significant p-values). CONCLUSIONS: Our strategy has proved the feasibility of active screening for leprosy in contacts and the introduction of PEP for leprosy under programmatic conditions. Only individuals living in the same household as the leprosy patient had a significant risk of contracting leprosy. We documented nine clusters of leprosy that could benefit from tailored control activities while optimizing resources.

The PEP++ study protocol: a cluster-randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of an enhanced regimen of post-exposure prophylaxis for close contacts of persons affected by leprosy to prevent disease transmission.

BACKGROUND: Leprosy is an infectious disease with a slow decline in global annual caseload in the past two decades. Active case finding and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with a single dose of rifampicin (SDR) are recommended by the World Health Organization as measures for leprosy elimination. However, more potent PEP regimens are needed to increase the effect in groups highest at risk (i.e., household members and blood relatives, especially of multibacillary patients). The PEP++ trial will assess the effectiveness of an enhanced preventive regimen against leprosy in high-endemic districts in India, Brazil, Bangladesh, and Nepal compared with SDR-PEP. METHODS: The PEP++ study is a cluster-randomised controlled trial in selected districts of India, Brazil, Bangladesh, and Nepal. Sub-districts will be allocated randomly to the intervention and control arms. Leprosy patients detected from 2015 - 22 living in the districts will be approached to list their close contacts for enrolment in the study. All consenting participants will be screened for signs and symptoms of leprosy and tuberculosis (TB). In the intervention arm, eligible contacts receive the enhanced PEP++ regimen with three doses of rifampicin (150 - 600 mg) and clarithromycin (150 - 500 mg) administered at four-weekly intervals, whereas those in the control arm receive SDR-PEP. Follow-up screening for leprosy will be done for each individual two years after the final dose is administered. Cox' proportion hazards analysis and Poisson regression will be used to compare the incidence rate ratios between the intervention and control areas as the primary study outcome. DISCUSSION: Past studies have shown that the level of SDR-PEP effectiveness is not uniform across contexts or in relation to leprosy patients. To address this, a number of recent trials are seeking to strengthen PEP regimens either through the use of new medications or by increasing the dosage of the existing ones. However, few studies focus on the impact of multiple doses of chemoprophylaxis using a combination of antibiotics. The PEP++ trial will investigate effectiveness of both an enhanced regimen and use geospatial analysis for PEP administration in the study communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL7022 on the Dutch Trial Register on April 12, 2018. Protocol version 9.0 updated on 18 August 2022 https://www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/23060.

Exposure History, Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Use, and Clinical Characteristics of Human Rabies Cases: A Twelve-Year Retrospective Review at a Tertiary Facility in Ghana.

BACKGROUND: Robust monitoring and reporting systems for rabies are lacking thus increasing the risk of underreporting. Highlighting the rabies cases brings to bear the needed urgent attention for more efforts at preventing and controlling the disease. OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiological characteristics of patients managed for clinical rabies at the largest referral facility in Ghana. METHODS: A retrospective single-center hospital-based chart review and data extraction were conducted for persons managed for clinical rabies infection at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital from January 2008 to December 2019. Data analysis was done using STATA. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Fisher's exact test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used to explore significant associations. RESULTS: A total of 28 cases were recorded over the period of review. All of them died and most (68%) of them were males. Twenty-one percent of them were less than 15 years old. Their median age interquartile range (IQR) was 31 years (25.5 years) and the median incubation period for rabies (IQR) was 60 days (60 days). The source of rabies for cases was mainly dog bites. The vaccination status of all the animals could not be ascertained. Majority (80%) of the patients took neither anti-rabies vaccine nor immunoglobulin as post-exposure prophylaxis after the dog bite. The median time of admission before death (interquartile range) was 2 days (2 days). Majority (82%) of the cases were furious rabies. CONCLUSION: Attention should be directed at mass vaccination of dogs as dog bites are common. Ensuring availability and access to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is also critical in averting rabies-related deaths.

CONTEXTE: Des systèmes de surveillance et de déclaration robustes pour la rage font défaut, augmentant ainsi le risque de sousdéclaration. Mettre en lumière les cas de rage suscite l'attention urgente nécessaire pour redoubler d'efforts dans la prévention et le contrôle de la maladie. OBJECTIF: Décrire les caractéristiques épidémiologiques des patients traités pour une rage clinique dans le plus grand établissement de référence au Ghana. MÉTHODES: Une revue rétrospective des dossiers médicaux et une extraction de données basées à l'hôpital ont été réalisées pour les personnes traitées pour une infection à la rage clinique à l'Hôpital d'Enseignement Korle-Bu de janvier 2008 à décembre 2019. L'analyse des données a été effectuée à l'aide de STATA. Des statistiques descriptives ont été utilisées pour résumer les caractéristiques épidémiologiques et cliniques. Le test exact de Fisher, le test de Kruskal-Wallis et le coefficient de corrélation de Spearman ont été utilisés pour explorer les associations significatives. RÉSULTATS: Un total de 28 cas ont été enregistrés sur la période examinée. Tous sont décédés et la plupart d'entre eux (68%) étaient des hommes. Vingt et un pour cent d'entre eux avaient moins de 15 ans. Leur âge médian (plage interquartile) était de 31 ans (25,5 ans) et la période d'incubation médiane de la rage (plage interquartile) était de 60 jours (60 jours). La principale source de rage pour les cas était principalement les morsures de chiens. Le statut vaccinal de tous les animaux n'a pas pu être déterminé. La majorité (80%) des patients n'ont pris ni vaccin antirabique ni immunoglobuline en prophylaxie post-exposition après la morsure de chien. Le délai médian d'admission avant le décès (plage interquartile) était de 2 jours (2 jours). La majorité (82%) des cas étaient atteints de rage furieuse. CONCLUSION: L'attention devrait être dirigée vers la vaccination de masse des chiens car les morsures de chien sont courantes. Assurer la disponibilité et l'accès à la prophylaxie post-exposition (PPE) est également crucial pour éviter les décès liés à la rage. MOTS-CLÉS: Rage, morsure de chien, post-exposition, prophylaxie, vaccination de masse.